Calorique

MET Values for Walking, Running, Cycling by Pace — Complete Reference 2026

60+ MET values from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities for every common walking, running, and cycling pace. Use them to calculate calories burned: kcal = METs × kg × hours. Reference for fitness apps, exercise physiologists, and anyone needing accurate metabolic data.

Updated April 2026 · Source: 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities (Herrmann SD et al.)

Walking & hiking (12 pace bands)

ActivityPaceMETCompendium code
Walking, very slow strolling< 2.0 mph217152
Walking, casual2.0 mph (30 min/mi)2.817160
Walking, slow leisurely2.5 mph (24 min/mi)317170
Walking, moderate3.0 mph (20 min/mi)3.517190
Walking, brisk3.5 mph (17 min/mi)4.317200
Walking, very brisk4.0 mph (15 min/mi)517220
Walking, very fast / power walk4.5 mph (13.3 min/mi)717231
Walking, race pace5.0 mph (12 min/mi)8.317235
Hiking, cross country, level terrain617080
Hiking, mountain ascent w/ pack7.817082
Climbing stairs, slow417134
Climbing stairs, fast8.817133

Running (17 pace bands)

ActivityPaceMETCompendium code
Jogging, general4-5 mph (12-15 min/mi)712020
Running, 5 mph12 min/mi8.312030
Running, 5.2 mph11.5 min/mi912040
Running, 6 mph10 min/mi9.812050
Running, 6.7 mph9 min/mi10.512070
Running, 7 mph8.5 min/mi1112080
Running, 7.5 mph8 min/mi11.812090
Running, 8 mph7.5 min/mi11.812100
Running, 8.6 mph7 min/mi12.312110
Running, 9 mph6.7 min/mi12.812120
Running, 10 mph6 min/mi14.512130
Running, 11 mph5.5 min/mi1612132
Running, 12 mph5 min/mi1912134
Running, 13 mph4.6 min/mi19.812135
Running, on track or treadmillgeneral812150
Running, cross country912010
Running, stairs, up1512025

Cycling (13 pace bands)

ActivityPace / PowerMETCompendium code
Bicycling, leisure< 10 mph401010
Bicycling, light effort10-11.9 mph6.801015
Bicycling, moderate12-13.9 mph801020
Bicycling, vigorous14-15.9 mph1001030
Bicycling, racing16-19 mph1201040
Bicycling, racing, fast> 20 mph15.801050
Bicycling, mountain, general8.501009
Bicycling, mountain, uphill1401008
Bicycling, BMX8.501005
Cycling, stationary, light50-100 watts5.502015
Cycling, stationary, moderate100-150 watts702018
Cycling, stationary, vigorous150-200 watts10.502020
Cycling, stationary, very vigorous> 200 watts12.502030

FAQ

What is a MET value?

MET (metabolic equivalent of task) is a unit measuring energy expenditure relative to rest. 1 MET = 3.5 mL O2/kg/min, the energy a person burns sitting quietly. The 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities (Herrmann et al., Journal of Sport and Health Science) is the global reference, listing 800+ activities with measured MET values from indirect calorimetry studies. Calories burned formula: kcal/min = METs × 3.5 × body weight (kg) ÷ 200. Or simpler: kcal = METs × hours × body weight (kg). Example: 70kg person walking 3.5 mph (4.3 METs) for 30 min = 4.3 × 0.5 × 70 = 150 kcal. METs are duration-independent — running 6 mph is always 9.8 METs whether you run 5 minutes or 60. Higher MET = more calories burned per minute. Light activity = <3 METs; moderate = 3-6; vigorous = >6.

How do MET values change with walking pace?

Walking MET values from the 2024 Compendium scale non-linearly with pace: 2.0 mph = 2.8 METs (casual stroll), 2.5 mph = 3.0 METs, 3.0 mph = 3.5 METs (moderate), 3.5 mph = 4.3 METs (brisk — first level meeting CDC moderate-intensity threshold of >3.0), 4.0 mph = 5.0 METs (very brisk), 4.5 mph = 7.0 METs (power walk — note big jump as gait approaches running), 5.0 mph = 8.3 METs (race-walking pace, energy cost equivalent to slow jogging). Hiking adds 1-3 METs depending on terrain and pack weight. Climbing stairs is much more intense: 4.0 METs slow, 8.8 METs fast. The non-linear jump above 4 mph happens because most people transition to a running-like gait around 4.5 mph, requiring more vertical motion. CDC guideline: 30 min/day of brisk walking (≥3 METs) for adults satisfies moderate-intensity recommendation.

What is the MET value for running by pace?

Running MET values per 2024 Compendium: 4-5 mph (jog) = 7.0 METs; 5 mph (12 min/mi) = 8.3 METs; 6 mph (10 min/mi) = 9.8 METs; 7 mph (8.5 min/mi) = 11.0 METs; 8 mph (7.5 min/mi) = 11.8 METs; 9 mph (6.7 min/mi) = 12.8 METs; 10 mph (6 min/mi) = 14.5 METs; 12 mph (5 min/mi) = 19.0 METs; 13 mph (4.6 min/mi) = 19.8 METs. Key observations: (1) MET ≈ pace in mph between 5-9 mph (rough rule of thumb). (2) The relationship becomes super-linear above 10 mph (elite training pace). (3) Cross-country running adds ~1 MET vs road. (4) Treadmill at 0% incline has slightly lower MET than overground at same pace (no air resistance) — typically 0.5-1.0 MET lower. For typical runner: 6-7 mph = standard moderate run, 8-9 mph = tempo run, 10+ mph = interval/race effort. Race-pace runs exceed 13 METs which is ACSM threshold for "very vigorous" intensity.

What is the MET value for cycling at different speeds?

Outdoor cycling MET values 2024 Compendium: <10 mph leisure = 4.0 METs, 10-11.9 mph (light effort) = 6.8 METs, 12-13.9 mph (moderate) = 8.0 METs, 14-15.9 mph (vigorous) = 10.0 METs, 16-19 mph (racing) = 12.0 METs, >20 mph (racing fast) = 15.8 METs. Mountain bike general = 8.5 METs; uphill = 14.0 METs. Stationary bike depends on power output (more accurate than perceived effort): 50-100W = 5.5 METs, 100-150W = 7.0 METs, 150-200W = 10.5 METs, >200W = 12.5 METs. Why outdoor vs stationary differs: outdoor includes wind resistance, terrain variation, balance/steering — adds ~1-2 METs at same speed. Indoor power-meter cycling is the most accurate calorie estimate available outside lab measurement. Apps like Zwift/Peloton use power × duration / efficiency factor (typically 4) to calculate kcal directly.

How accurate are MET values for calorie counting?

MET-based calorie estimation accuracy 2026 evidence: (1) Population-level: ±10-15% accuracy for groups; the Compendium values are population means from 100s of indirect calorimetry studies. (2) Individual-level: ±20-35% error for individuals; varies due to body composition, fitness level, age, sex, and biomechanics. (3) Specific issues: very lean people burn slightly more per kg than obese people at same MET (lower mechanical efficiency). Trained athletes burn LESS per MET than sedentary at same speed (higher efficiency). Weight estimation errors compound — being off 5kg = 7% kcal error. (4) Most accurate alternatives: heart rate-based (used by Apple Watch, Garmin) ±10-15% individual; doubly-labeled water ±5% (lab only). Practical use: MET tables are excellent for SETTING TARGETS (X kcal/day deficit), but should NOT be relied on for sub-200 kcal precision. Trust trends over weeks, not single workouts. Stationary cycling power meters and heart rate monitors give best wearable accuracy.

How do I calculate calories from METs?

Standard formula 2026: Calories burned = METs × weight (kg) × duration (hours). EXAMPLE 1: 70kg person, walking 3.5 mph (4.3 METs), 30 minutes. Calories = 4.3 × 70 × 0.5 = 150 kcal. EXAMPLE 2: 80kg person, running 6 mph (9.8 METs), 45 min. Calories = 9.8 × 80 × 0.75 = 588 kcal. EXAMPLE 3: 60kg person, cycling 12 mph (8.0 METs), 60 min. Calories = 8.0 × 60 × 1.0 = 480 kcal. CONVERT pounds to kg: lb ÷ 2.205. CONVERT minutes to hours: min ÷ 60. Some calculators use the longer formula: kcal/min = METs × 3.5 × kg / 200. This is the same equation rearranged. Net vs gross calories: above formulas give GROSS (total). NET = gross minus what you would have burned at rest (1 MET). For most uses, gross is fine; subtract ~70 kcal/hour at rest if precision matters. Always use the SPECIFIC pace MET, not "running" generic — 5 mph vs 9 mph differs by 80% of caloric burn rate.

What activities meet CDC moderate vs vigorous intensity?

CDC/ACSM 2024 thresholds: MODERATE = 3.0-5.9 METs; VIGOROUS = 6.0+ METs. CDC weekly recommendation: 150 min moderate OR 75 min vigorous OR equivalent combination. Specific examples by category: MODERATE (walking 2.5-4 mph, gardening, doubles tennis, slow swim, light cycling, leisurely dance). VIGOROUS (running ≥4.5 mph, singles tennis, cycling >12 mph, swim laps, basketball game, hiking with pack, soccer match, jump rope). Critical detail: MET thresholds are ABSOLUTE, not relative. A frail 80-year-old walking 2 mph (2.8 METs) is at near-maximum personal exertion but technically below CDC moderate. Adjusted recommendations exist for older adults (relative scale: % HR max). Modern guidance emphasizes ANY movement reduces mortality 20-25% compared to sedentary. The specific MET threshold matters for athletes optimizing training, not for general health. Apple Watch and Garmin both use MET-based intensity classification when GPS speed is available.

Related